News Articles

Donohue joins 'No on A' chorus
Salinas: Mayor says measure too costly for county
Posted on May 24, 2007
By CLAUDIA MELÉNDEZ
SALINAS
Herald Salinas Bureau
For Salinas Mayor Dennis Donohue, it's "no, no, yes." Repeating his
mantra of economic development as a road to peace and prosperity,
the top elected official of the county's most populous city came out
against a measure that would prevent most growth on agricultural
land unless approved by Monterey County voters.
Surrounded by "No on A" promoters and posters, Donohue said Measure
A "will ultimately cost this county billions of dollars of revenues
and thousands of new employment opportunities."
Monterey County voters will be asked June 5 to weigh in on four
questions that will ultimately decide how the region grows in
unincorporated areas.
Measure A asks the voters to approve the General Plan Initiative, a
plan that would require a countywide vote for most development on
farmland. Measure B asks voters to reject the land-use plan approved
by the Board of Supervisors, and Measure C asks voters to confirm
it. Measure D — which Donohue said he would not take a position on —
would repeal Butterfly
Village, a 670-unit housing development north of Salinas.
It's a set of complicated issues that's baffling many residents,
Donohue said, and that's why he decided to toss his opinion into the
mix.
"I observe there are so many good people who want to be good
citizens by simply voting, and they're confused," he said.
Donohue, who doubles as president of an agricultural company, is the
eighth mayor in Monterey County to add his voice to the "No on
A" campaign. All the mayors of the Salinas Valley cities — and all
of the councils except for Salinas — have expressed opposition to
Measure A.
Because of pending litigation against Salinas, the city attorney
recommended that the council as a whole not take a position on the
issue. Elected officials
could make their views known as long as they made clear that was not
the official position of the city, Donohue said.
Councilwoman Jyl Lutes, a strong backer of Measure A,
said she was surprised to hear about Donohue's public
stance.
"He'd always said he's not going to take a position,
but I'm also a little surprised because Measure A is
good for cities," she said. "With Measure A, cities is
where growth occurs, and we can direct resources to
the cities."
Donohue said he wasn't taking a position to side with developers but
to air concerns about the measure's potential to stifle agriculture,
the county's largest source of revenue.
"Measure A will not allow the wine industry to reach its full
potential as possibly the world's next premier wine region," he
said.
Lutes acknowledged the citizen-driven initiative had flaws,
including not making room for the wine industry as the supervisors'
approved plan does.
"But I think that can be overcome," she said. "Just after the dust
settles, we go back to the ballot and say, 'Let's adjust Measure A'
and things that make
sense you can go back to the voters and say, 'Let's readjust it.'"
That's what opponents to Measure A want to avoid: having to go back
to the voters every time a plan that would be in place for 25 years
needs tweaking.
"If any area in this world calls for good political battle over its
future, Monterey County does," Donohue said. "But there's a right
way and a wrong way to wage that battle. There's a right way and a
wrong way to make policy. Measure A is not the right way."
Claudia Meléndez Salinas can be reached at 753-6755 or cmelendez@montereyherald.com.
|